<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>typosquatting &#8211; Crawford Ellenbogen</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ce-cpa.com/tag/typosquatting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ce-cpa.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2020 16:19:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Typosquatters profit from common user errors</title>
		<link>https://www.ce-cpa.com/typosquatters-profit-from-common-user-errors/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellenbogen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2019 13:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersquatting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phishing scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typosquatting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ce-cpa.com/?p=3263</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Web has opened plenty of new avenues for criminal behavior. For example, you may have heard of cybersquatting. Someone registers a site’s domain name that includes a trademark and then tries to profit by selling that name to the trademark owner. But are you familiar with typosquatting? You should be — because these schemes]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Web has opened plenty of new avenues for criminal behavior.
For example, you may have heard of cybersquatting. Someone registers a site’s
domain name that includes a trademark and then tries to profit by selling that
name to the trademark owner.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But are you familiar with typosquatting? You should be — because
these schemes can make just about any organization, along with visitors to its
website, the victims of fraud.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Fat fingers</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Like cybersquatting, typosquatting (also known as URL hijacking)
involves the purchase of domain names in bad faith. It takes advantage of an
inclination among users known as “fat fingers” — basically, our tendency to hit
the wrong keys and enter misspelled trademarks or brands. For example, in a
case involving the retailer Lands’ End, a typosquatter registered domains such
as <a href="http://landswnd.com">landswnd.com</a> and <a href="http://lnadsend.com">lnadsend.com</a>. Other human errors — for example,
typing the wrong URL extension (.com instead of .org) or omitting punctuation
marks such as hyphens — can also work to typosquatters’ advantage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Some fraudsters seek to divert consumers away from competitors
or just draw traffic to their own sites (often pornography or dating sites). A
recent report from security firm DomainTools LLC says that major media outlets,
including <em>USA Today</em>,
the <em>New York Times</em>
and the <em>Washington Post</em>,
are frequently targeted. DomainTools found hundreds of fraudulent domain names
related to these publications.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Big money</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Other typosquatters go further. For example, the websites they
divert to might feature a phishing scheme, whereby a visitor is induced to
enter login information or download malware. Such tactics can make big money
for fraud perpetrators — particularly if they target the right sites. Earlier
this year, an anonymous typosquatter announced that he had stolen 200 bitcoins
(then worth an estimated $760,000) from Dark Web sites over the previous four
years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Typosquatting can also be used for corporate espionage. In one
case, a law firm sued a programmer who had obtained a domain name similar to
its own, except for a minor typo. The law firm alleged that the defendant had
used his doppelgänger domain name to create fake email accounts and intercept
email sent to the firm.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Best defenses</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When it comes to avoiding typosquatting, awareness is probably
the best defense. Your company should regularly check various mistyped versions
of its URLs and consider purchasing as many similar domain names as possible.
Contact us if you’re worried about fraud — both on- and off-line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
